Ans. LIMITATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Despite
the fact that financial statements are the back-bones of the decision-making
process for different levels of executives in an organisation, financial
analysts and advisors and other interested persons, these suffer from certain
limitations because the facts and figures which are reported may not be
precise, exact and final. Again some aspects which may be crucial for
decision-making purposes may go unreported.
1) Periodic
nature of statements : The profit or loss arrived at in the Profit and
Loss Account is for a specified period. It does not give any idea about the
earning capacity over time. Similarly, the financial position as at the date of
Balance Seet is true of that point of time. The likely change in position on a
future date is not depicted. Liabilities which were dependent on future events
(contingent liabilities) are estimated and shown in the Balance Sheet. They are
not accurate figures. Similarly, revenue expenditure is sometimes partly
charged to Profit and Loss Account and partly deferred or carried forward. The
proportion which is deferred and shown on the asset side of Balance Sheet is
based on convenience and depends on the level of earnings relatively to the
expenditure. In all these respects the annual statements do not reveal the
exact earning capacity or financial state of affairs.
2) The
statements are not realistic : Financial statements are prepared on
the basis of certain accounting concepts and conventions. As a result, the
financial position depicted in the statements cannot be considered realistic.
For example, fixed assets are required to be shown on the basis of their value
to the business as represented by their acquisition price less depreciation,
not as per the estimated resale price. Also, the Profit and Loss Account
invariably includes probable losses but does not include probable income. This is
according to the accounting convention of conservation.
3) Lack of
objectivity due to personal judgement : Values assigned to many items are
determined on the basis of the personal judgement of accountants. Hence,
relevant amounts shown in the financial statements have no objectivity and they
are not varifiable. For instance, estimates of the life of fixed assets and the
method of depreciation to be used are based on the personal judgement of
accountants. So is the case with valuation of inventories (stock) of materials,
work in progress, stores and spare parts, etc. The method of valuation to be
adopted depends on the poilicy at the discretion of management based on their
judgement.
4) Only
financial matters are reported: The financial statements present information
in terms of monetary units. There is no information relating to the nonmonetary
aspects of business operations. Facts which cannot be depicted in money terms
are excluded from the statements. Thus, information relating to the development
of skill and efficiency of employees, the reputation of management, public
image of the firm, and such matters do not find a place in the financial
statements. Yet these are very relevant for investors to consider while forming
any opinion about the future prospects of the firm.
5) No Suggestive
Approach :
Financial Statements disclose information about the past (historical) i.e. what
has happened? But it does not disclose why and how it happened. If a company
makes profits or incurs losses, the financial statements will show only the
amount of profits or losses made but fails to divulge any details as to why
there is an increase or decrease in profits or losses.
6) Subjective
Approach of the Management : Financial performance (profitability)
cannot be taken as the only indicator of managerial performance. The profit
figures, to a greater extent, are affected by managerial policy of charging
depreciation, writing off fictitious assets, amortisation of intangible assets,
allocation of advertisement cost, valuation of stock etc. Likewise, objectivity
factor is lost while preparing financial statements to depict the financial
position of the concern. Further application of certain concepts and
conventions does not allow to show the assets at the true current values (cost
concept). The assets shown in the Balance Sheet reflect unexpired cost (W.D.V.)
However, liabilities are shown at the same figures thereby distrorting the
solvency position of the enterprise. Likewise, the accounting year may be
chosen after due thought so that financial statements can send the desired
signals to outside interested parties.
7) Conflicting
Principles :
According to Principle of conservatism stock may be valued at cost or market
price whichever is less. This implies that current assets are shown at cost in
one year and at marker price the other year. It shows clear violation of
principle of consistency. Similarly the change of method of charging
depreciation from straight line method to written down value method and vice
versa highlights contradiction in application of accounting principles. Again,
because of flexibility of accounting principles, certain liabilities are not
provided for, such as no provision for gratuity payment is made. This is bound
to give distorted picture of the financial statements.
8) Figures are
not-self explanatory : How far the financial statements are useful depends
upon the ability of the users to analyse and interpret accounting data for
their decision making purposes. Truly accounting is the language of the business
but financial statements do not speak themselves, you need certain expertise
and tools to make them speak. Every user is not competent to draw conclusions
from these statements. Even audited financial statements do not provide a
complete and total guarantee of accuracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment