Ans. Ethical v/s Unethical Activities
Even when there is proactive behaviour on parts of many MNCs in
their marketing practices, some of their activities have been debated regarding
their ethical nature. While many issues have been raised in this debate, major
ones having a bearing on international trade are listed below.
i)
Selling Products Less in Demand in Home Countries : After
products reach maturity or face decline in demand due to their particular stage
in product life cycles in developed markets, there is pressure on firms to sell
them in the markets of less developed countries (LDC). Such is the case about
tobacco products. It is experiencing decline in consumption in USA and Europe
due increased awareness about its potential bad effects. In addition, there is
increased competition among producers. Many tobacco companies to retain their
profitability are targeting the LDC markets where smokers are not fully awate
of the risk of smoking. Such a move is open to question regarding its ethical
nature.
ii)
Selling Prohibited Products in LDC Markets : In some
cases drugs and chemicals prohibited in developed countries, due to their
harmful effects, are being sold in LDC countries. This has been justified as
not necessarily exploitative. Take the case of DDT. It is known to contaminate
ground but it is also only known counter to malaria-bearing mosquitoes and
therefore benefits of its use in a LDC, where malaria is rampant, far outweigh
its cost. Similar arguments have been also advanced in respect to many drugs
and veterinary products, withdrawn from developed country markets due to their
side effects, as still useful to LDCs who cannot afford the high priced
developed substitutes, now in use in developed countries.
iii)
Selling Products Likely to be Misused : Products
developed to be used in an environment may be used incorrectly by consumers due
to changed circumstances, lack of knowledge or scarcity of resources. If such
misuse can be foreseen, marketing of such products is unethical. One such case
was marketing of milk powder by Nestle in LDCs. The company was not fully
mindful of its implications for the mothers and the babies, in situation of
lack of clean water, money and training. Investigations of some pressure groups
have revealed the following.
iv)
Restrictive Trade Policies : Restrictive trade policies
adopted by certain governments have been labelled as unethical by other
governments and companies in international trade. The relative closeness of
Japanese market has been attributed to many historical and cultural factors
(such as Japanese consumers having tradition of purchasing locally produced
goods that is perceived to be superior) but also due to protectionist policies
pursued by the government there. There have been high import tariff and
non-tariff barriers for wide range of products.
v)
Dumping : Dumping occurs when goods produced in one country are offered for
sale, in large quantity, at very low price, in international markets. Such
trade has been regarded as questionable. Reasons behind such trade include
state subsidies, debt write-offs and high exit barriers of a particular industry
(e.g. steel, shipbuilding and aircraft manufacturing). Such trade leads to
hurting of business and jobs in one country by state-supported, non-viable jobs
in another country. A case of supporting non-viable jobs is evident in many
national air-carriers, which are subsidized even when there is substantial
over-capacity in the industry.
vi)
Counterfeiting : This growing problem relate to firms
violating the patent and copyright of another firm, usually in case of luxury
products. The product copies 0 are normally produced in LDCs. This leads to
creation of jobs in copying countries, mostly LDCs, and consumers, particularly
in developed countries, have opportunity of purchasing a copy of a luxury
product at very low price. However, the producers of original products claim
that this practice leads to diminishing value for their products, whose image
has been built through large investment. There are many that hold that the
concept of counterfeiting and the violation of intellectual property right
appear to be a Western and ethnocentric view of ethics. If such right exists
than China should get royalty for noodles, compass and ice cream.
vii)
Grey Marketing : This arises when goods are imported and sold
through market distribution channels not authorized by the manufacturer. It
occurs mainly due to significant differences in market price of same product in
different countries. Such difference in price can occur due to variation in
exchange rates, differences in country taxation rates and differences in market
cost structures. This makes it attractive for an unauthorized dealer to
purchase branded products at low rates in one country and sell it at higher
price in another country. Such practice, when assumes significant proportion,
makes the authorized dealer demotivated.
No comments:
Post a Comment